For the past several weeks, I’ve been on a deep dive, exploring the true software development capabilities of modern AI. My primary tools have been Google's Gemini Pro and OpenAI's ChatGPT, and the experience has been a rollercoaster, swinging me between extreme excitement and profound disappointment.
The central question I wanted to answer was simple: Is the hype about AI replacing developers real? Based on my experiment, the answer is a resounding, and somewhat terrifying, yes. The shift is coming sooner than many of us think.
Setting the Stage: The Right Tools and a Real-World Test
First, a practical note: if you intend to seriously explore AI for coding, a paid subscription is non-negotiable. Free-tier usage limits are hit within minutes. I opted for a Gemini Pro subscription, having long trusted Google's products, and it did not disappoint.
To create a meaningful test, I focused on a tangible goal: generating complete, functional plugins for WordPress. WordPress is an ideal testbed; it provides a robust framework for user administration, content management, and deployment, allowing the AI to focus on core plugin logic.
The AI Delivered, But Not Without a Guide
Gemini proved fully capable of building a complex WordPress plugin from scratch. It meticulously generated the necessary code and provided clear instructions on how to structure the files and folders. While this involved some manual copy-pasting, it required zero lines of original code from my end.
However, the success of this entire endeavor hinged on one critical element: the quality of my initial prompt.
This is where the new role of the developer begins to emerge. I didn't just write "build me a music planner plugin." I prepared a two-page document packed with detailed instructions, specifications, and requirements. This included:
I even used AI to complete this guidance and these instructions. I fed this comprehensive brief to the AI. The result was staggering.
From Two Months to 15 Minutes
In just 15 minutes, Gemini generated a plugin that replicated the core functionality of a project I built last year, http://Setlistplanner.com. That original project took me two months of dedicated work.
Let that sink in. A project that consumed two months of my life was functionally replicated by an AI in less time than it takes to drink a cup of coffee.
This experience solidifies my belief that developers must urgently reorient their careers. The core skill is no longer writing line-by-line code, but learning to architect systems and communicate specifications to an AI agent with absolute precision. The new challenge will be managing the software generation process to maintain quality and control.
The Trade-off: Speed vs. Quality
And control is desperately needed, because the code, while functional, is riddled with issues. The quality of AI-generated code is, at present, low. It's often brittle, inefficient, and lacks the robust security practices necessary for a production environment. It works, but it won't protect you from a determined hacker.
This creates an immediate and massive opportunity for cybersecurity experts and ethical hackers. The demand for in-depth testing and security auditing of AI-generated software is about to explode. Of course, it's only a matter of time before that, too, becomes automated.
The Inevitable Horizon
The so-called "godfathers of AI" predict that within six years, AI will surpass the intelligence of the most brilliant developers, mathematicians, and physicists. From that point on, AI agents will learn from each other, free from human guidance, at a speed we cannot comprehend. What happens then is anyone's guess.
For now, the message is clear. The ground beneath the software development industry is shifting. The ability to write flawless code is being commoditized. The developers who thrive will be those who master the art of prompting, architectural design, and rigorous validation—becoming the conductors of an AI orchestra, rather than the players themselves.